← All Articles

Team Outlooks

Titans Backfield Breakdown: Tony Pollard, Tyjae Spears and Nick Singleton

Tony Pollard remains first on Tennessee’s depth chart, but Tyjae Spears’ receiving role and rookie Nick Singleton’s upside make this one of the more interesting three-back rooms to evaluate.

Share on X

The Titans kept four running backs on their initial 53-man roster: Tony Pollard, Tyjae Spears, Nick Singleton and Julius Chestnut.

The names are familiar. The fantasy roles are not quite as simple.

Tennessee’s latest unofficial depth chart lists Pollard first, with Spears and Singleton behind him. That makes Pollard the safest projection for Week 1.

But fantasy football is not only about who takes the first snap.

Spears has a clear receiving role, while Singleton gives the Titans a younger, explosive option whose role can grow as the season develops.

This is a backfield where price matters more than simply identifying a “starter.”

Tony Pollard Still Owns the Best Floor

Pollard was productive in 2025.

He played all 17 games and handled 242 carries for 1,082 rushing yards and five touchdowns. He added 33 receptions for 206 yards.

That gave him 1,288 yards from scrimmage on 275 touches.

The encouraging part was efficiency. Pollard averaged 4.5 yards per carry despite playing in an offense that was still developing around young quarterback Cam Ward.

Nothing about Tennessee’s roster construction says Pollard is suddenly finished.

He remains first on the depth chart and is the safest bet to lead the Titans in carries.

But his receiving workload is where the ceiling becomes less secure.

Tyjae Spears Is the PPR Problem for Pollard

Spears played only 13 games last season, but he caught 45 passes on 50 targets.

That is a major number relative to his rushing workload.

Spears carried the ball only 72 times for 283 yards, yet his receiving role kept him involved. He finished with 547 yards from scrimmage despite missing four games.

In full PPR, those catches matter.

A back does not need 15 carries to post a useful fantasy line if he is consistently catching four or five passes.

That is the central tension in this backfield.

Pollard can lead the team in rushing attempts while Spears still removes some of the most fantasy-friendly touches from his profile.

Nick Singleton Is the Wild Card

Singleton is the player who makes this backfield more difficult to project over a full season.

Tennessee selected him in the fifth round with the 165th overall pick after a highly productive career at Penn State.

Singleton finished his college career with school records for 55 total touchdowns and 5,586 all-purpose yards. At 6-foot and 219 pounds, he gives Tennessee a combination of size and explosiveness, and he also has real receiving experience.

His 2024 season showed the complete profile: 1,099 rushing yards, 12 rushing touchdowns, 41 catches, 375 receiving yards and five receiving touchdowns.

That does not mean he immediately jumps Pollard or Spears.

Fifth-round rookies are not guaranteed roles.

But Singleton is talented enough that Tennessee does not need an injury to begin working him into the offense.

How I Expect the Roles to Start

The cleanest early-season projection is:

Pollard: lead early-down back and carry leader.

Spears: passing-down/change-of-pace option with the best reception upside.

Singleton: rotational runner whose workload can expand if he performs well.

Chestnut: depth and special teams.

That structure makes Pollard usable but also places pressure on his touchdown production.

If he loses passing-down work to Spears and occasional early-down work to Singleton, he could need strong rushing efficiency and goal-line carries to return a major profit.

Cam Ward Changes the Offensive Context

There is another reason to avoid evaluating these backs entirely from last year’s numbers.

Cam Ward is entering Year 2.

The Titans have also added more receiving talent around him, including Carnell Tate and Wan’Dale Robinson, while retaining Calvin Ridley and Elic Ayomanor.

If Ward takes a step forward, the entire offense should create more scoring opportunities.

That would help Pollard near the goal line and give Spears more receiving upside.

A better offense can support multiple running backs even when the touch split is annoying.

The question is whether Tennessee becomes good enough for that to happen.

Who Has the Best Value?

Pollard has the safest workload.

Spears has the most attractive PPR-specific skill.

Singleton has the best “what if this changes quickly?” profile.

That means my preferred pick can change depending on draft cost.

If Pollard falls because managers are scared of the committee, I am comfortable drafting him as an RB3.

If Spears is available substantially later, I like him as a bench back whose catches can create standalone usefulness.

Singleton is the player I want in deeper leagues because his role has the most room to grow.

The Injury Upside Is Also Important

This backfield becomes much easier for fantasy if one member of the trio misses time.

If Pollard is unavailable, Spears and Singleton could split a highly valuable workload.

If Spears misses time, Pollard’s target projection rises.

If Singleton misses time, the backfield becomes much closer to the Pollard/Spears structure we already understand.

That means all three have some contingent upside — but Singleton’s acquisition cost should be the lowest.

My Fantasy Read

Tony Pollard is still the Titans running back I would draft first, but I do not want to pay for a workhorse workload that may not exist.

Spears’ 45 receptions in 13 games last season are a reminder that he can take valuable PPR touches without leading the team in carries.

Singleton is the late pick I find most interesting. He has NFL size, receiving ability and a strong college production profile, and Tennessee spent a draft pick to add him to a room that already had Pollard and Spears.

My approach:

Draft Pollard when he falls.

Draft Spears when the PPR discount is large enough.

Stash Singleton when benches are deep.

This is not a backfield I want to overpay to solve in August. It is one I want to attack based on price — because there are legitimate paths for all three backs to matter in 2026.